The Forge Forums Read-only Archives
The live Forge Forums
|
Articles
|
Reviews
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
August 10, 2022, 09:19:49 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes:
Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:
Advanced search
275647
Posts in
27717
Topics by
4285
Members Latest Member:
-
Jason DAngelo
Most online today:
72
- most online ever:
565
(October 17, 2020, 02:08:06 PM)
The Forge Archives
Inactive Forums
The Riddle of Steel
Further customized and diverse combat rules - Just Say No
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Author
Topic: Further customized and diverse combat rules - Just Say No (Read 6402 times)
Ron Edwards
Global Moderator
Member
Posts: 16490
Further customized and diverse combat rules - Just Say No
«
on:
May 01, 2002, 05:45:30 AM »
Hi folks,
The "Playing The Riddle of Steel (a little)" thread has split topics a few times, so I'll start a new thread from one of them.
Speaking as both a role-player concerned with potential rules-bloat and as a practicing hitter-of-other-people, I think that the combat rules in TROS, as it stands, are sufficient to account for nearly any weapon or "style" people are going to come up with. To Jake and Rick: as practicing martial artists, I assume that none of what I'm about to say is going to shock you. It will almost certainly horrify and outrage anyone who is only book-familiar or movie-familiar with hitting and hurting other people.
A cut is a cut. A counter is a counter. An evasion is an evasion. All the Maneuver sets are customizable in the same sense as is made explicit in the Mass Weapon and Polearm texts. A tonfa is (shock!) a club. If you want to use a kusari-gama, you have Grappling, Thrown, and Whatnot rules right there for you to combine.
I see absolutely no reason, whatsoever, for special rules to treat a katana and its associated "moves" any differently from an arming sword or longsword, depending on the sword's length. All the differences would come through color descriptions during play. The stances would
look
different, but they are still offensive, defensive, and neutral.
The only thing I might consider would be penalizing Style Analysis for people facing unfamiliar cultures' swordwork, but even that would be temporary.
Now for unarmed combat. People are going to call for whole Manuever sets based on WTF Tae Kwon Do, Gracie Jujitsu, and whatever smooth blend is calling itself Jeet Kune Do these days. Again, I suggest hardening your heart against their plaintive cries.
I suggest keeping unarmed combat almost completely generic or similarly customizable from a basic Maneuver set. Despite extensive claims to the contrary, martial arts as we know them today are not representative of fighting-people's non-sportive unarmed combat from pre-modern times. (No, samurai did not practice jujitsu or Goju-ryu kata. No, Silla knights did not practice Hwa-rang Do. No, Shao-lin monks did not practice kung fu. I don't care what sensei, sabum, or sifu says. Email me privately for a scorching discussion thereof.)
I do think that specializing in such combat may be more effective than pictured in the book, but perhaps that's covered by taking Accuracy (for striking knees or locking the throat) and also by the special "head-battering" Shock rules. I also think that unarmed Counter against weapons, while risky, is worth considering; nearly all practical unarmed fighting arts concentrate on this matter for obvious reasons.
Best,
Ron
Logged
Ace
Member
Posts: 204
Further customized and diverse combat rules - Just Say No
«
Reply #1 on:
May 01, 2002, 09:30:05 AM »
I am with you on this Ron with some very minor reservations...
There are a few (very few) weapons and styles that if included will require either new rules or an adaptation of the rules.
Examples include bolas (who are a little different than a standard grapple) and nets
I agree with you completely, to make any weapoons style just vary the styles and defaults as well as the flavor text.
Otherwise a sword is well a sword......
Logged
Bankuei
Guest
Further customized and diverse combat rules - Just Say No
«
Reply #2 on:
May 01, 2002, 11:44:50 AM »
I concur with you on this Ron. I can already see almost everything covered even before you start into manuevers. Most of the manuevers in the book need not even be applied for a solid sim of combat. The basic rules are sufficient, and the manuevers cover everything beyond that(at least that I can think of).
Chris
Logged
Lance D. Allen
Member
Posts: 1962
Further customized and diverse combat rules - Just Say No
«
Reply #3 on:
May 01, 2002, 02:12:11 PM »
I actually agree as well Ron, despite the fact that it was (I believe) my post which in-part inspired this post.
Personally, I don't want a glut of new rules and new weapons.. I honestly just want the new weapons.. Call me a freak, but I love extensive weapon lists. Armor lists too. I see the existing rules working with almost all of the weapons I suggested. Maybe a new style for certain weapons, but the same ol' maneuvers, for the most part. What I'm hoping for out of the Flower of Battle is fairly simple.
A few more styles, just 'cause.
A few more maneuvers, just 'cause.
Lotsa weapons and armor, just 'cause I love that stuff.
An in-depth analysis of real-time combat, because I love that stuff too.
Rules and guidelines for applying the analysis of RTC, (flow of maneuvers, etc.)
Clarifications of existing rules (such as the issues expressed about the "Beat" Maneuver.. It states that surprise is crucial, but the rules don't support this. You declare a beat, then your opponent gets to react to a beat. It would make more sense if it was like a feint, declared as a strike, then revealed as a beat after defense was declared..But this is just my opinion)
Special Rules for special weapons, like the bola and net that Ace mentioned.
The only exception I have is martial arts.. I think it ought to have at least one style of it's own. As it stands, hand-to-hand combat is limited to punch, kick, grapple and wrestle. While these are flexible enough for many different situations, there should be a few other techniques available, such as the unarmed counter you mentioned, or even the (assumed fantastic) sword-catch.
Perhaps what I really want is a specialty which includes more of the standard techniques than simple brawling does. It consists, as it stands, of punch, kick grapple, and grapple, parry. Throw counter, block (unarmed only, of course), bind and strike, hook, stop short, feint, and maybe a special parry effective against weapons with reduced chance of hurting yourself, and I'd be entirely happy.
Logged
~Lance Allen
Wolves Den Publishing
Eternally Incipient Publisher of Mage Blade, ReCoil and Rats in the Walls
Rattlehead
Member
Posts: 159
Further customized and diverse combat rules - Just Say No
«
Reply #4 on:
May 01, 2002, 08:23:07 PM »
I'm sure Jake can say whether I'm right with this, but I really got the impression that the maneuvers and styles were as much for "flavor" as anything else. That said, I'd personally love to see loads of new weapons, new styles, perhaps a whole chapter on unarmed martial arts and an extensive armor list. (I like that stuff too. :-)
The 'mo flavor, the 'mo better!
Brandon
Logged
Grooby!
Nick the Nevermet
Member
Posts: 352
Further customized and diverse combat rules - Just Say No
«
Reply #5 on:
May 01, 2002, 08:41:41 PM »
I'm sure we can all thing of some pretty simple ways to extend unarmed martial arts. The one I have the biggest problems with are lock/breaks. As the rules currently stand, you wrestle to pin or throw. And if you got them pinned, you can then whip out a knife and kill them pretty easily.
-Nevermet
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
=> Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
General Forge Forums
-----------------------------
=> First Thoughts
=> Playtesting
=> Endeavor
=> Actual Play
=> Publishing
=> Connections
=> Conventions
=> Site Discussion
-----------------------------
Archive
-----------------------------
=> RPG Theory
=> GNS Model Discussion
=> Indie Game Design
-----------------------------
Independent Game Forums
-----------------------------
=> Adept Press
=> Arkenstone Publishing
=> Beyond the Wire Productions
=> Black and Green Games
=> Bully Pulpit Games
=> Dark Omen Games
=> Dog Eared Designs
=> Eric J. Boyd Designs
=> Errant Knight Games
=> Galileo Games
=> glyphpress
=> Green Fairy Games
=> Half Meme Press
=> Incarnadine Press
=> lumpley games
=> Muse of Fire Games
=> ndp design
=> Night Sky Games
=> one.seven design
=> Robert Bohl Games
=> Stone Baby Games
=> These Are Our Games
=> Twisted Confessions
=> Universalis
=> Wild Hunt Studios
-----------------------------
Inactive Forums
-----------------------------
=> My Life With Master Playtest
=> Adamant Entertainment
=> Bob Goat Press
=> Burning Wheel
=> Cartoon Action Hour
=> Chimera Creative
=> CRN Games
=> Destroy All Games
=> Evilhat Productions
=> HeroQuest
=> Key 20 Publishing
=> Memento-Mori Theatricks
=> Mystic Ages Online
=> Orbit
=> Scattershot
=> Seraphim Guard
=> Wicked Press
=> Review Discussion
=> XIG Games
=> SimplePhrase Press
=> The Riddle of Steel
=> Random Order Creations
=> Forge Birthday Forum