Solar System's Demons: Sorcerer Science Fiction

<< < (2/3) > >>

Judd:
Descriptors ahoy...

Stamina

How did these humans mold their bodies?

Military: Training, conditioning and violence.

Healthy: Exercise, nutrition and cleaning living.

Fragile: Diseased, scarred or too long in zero-g.

More than human: Cyborg, nano-bot host or vat-bred super-human.


Will

What formed these humans' psyche?

Hierarchy: Family, corporation or military.

Recidivism: Crime, prison and repeat.

Belief System: Religion, philosophy or dogma.

Politician: Mover, shaker, policy-maker

Lore

How do these humans relate to bleeding edge technology?

Science: Laboratory, experiments and funding.

Test Subject: Guinea pig and positive control.

Nexus: Birth, environment, and circumstance.

Hack: Standard technology + innovation = something new

Merely Human: Luddite, fragile, endangered species.
(for 1 Lore only, possibly only available after a first character has gone to 0 or 10 Humanity)


Other thoughts:

I am worried that in making space travel too slow, I might end up with a map of the solar system where no one will go anywhere because it would mean the death of every NPC on the back of their sheet or a real isolation between characters over vast gulfs of time and space.  I'll research up real travel times as they currently exist and see what there is to see.

Thoughts appreciated...

Christoph Boeckle:
Hi Judd

I like the questions that introduce the descriptors, and the descriptors themselves.

Two quick (nitpicky) notes on the Solar System as we know it today: Pluto and Charon are very near one to another. Pluto is 70% of our Moon's diameter, Charon 35%. Their masses are only a factor 10 apart (whereas the Moon is a 100 times less massive than the Earth). All this leads to a intricate system where they both rotate around an axis that is outside of either object's physical structure (one can say that the Moon rotates around the earth, because it's centre of rotation is roughly at the centre of the Earth). All this is to say that if somebody reached Pluto, they might as well have reached Charon, whereas your note seems to suggest that Charon is another beast. Yeah, very nitpicky eh?

In 2001 NASA estimated a trip to Mars to last five and a half months, if the distance between Earth and Mars is optimal. Now, there is lots to be said about gravity assist of big bodies to speed up a spacecraft, so it's unrealistic to just do a proportional rule. A trip to Pluto is under way by a probe, it should reach it in 2015, after less than ten years. The way back would probably be longer, because Pluto cannot give as big a "slingshot" as bodies in the vicinity of Earth.

Now you could extrapolate into the future and cut these times some. An interesting scaling would be to bring the durations to similar things as the first explorers in the 16th century had. Say 3-4 years for a trip around the globe (<=> Pluto and back?) Makes travel an important investment in time, but you don't get the big delays one reads of in some SF. Also, at such scales, time-dilation is negligible: a gross estimate with those sizes suggests that the average speed of such a spacecraft would be under 500'000 km/h, which is about 4/10'000 of the speed of light, whereas relativistic effects are considered to become important at 1/10 the speed of light.

I haven't given it much thought, but even if you went the speed of light route, the relativistic effects wouldn't be that important on one trip (a voyager first has to accelerate, and the decelerate). Pluto is a bit less than 6 light-hours away from the Sun. So at most, a trip to Pluto and back would make you save 12 hours compared to somebody left on Earth. Probably less because of the time spent accelerating and decelerating. Let's say it's half of that. I'd have to travel back and forth 1'460 times to save a year compared to those left back on Earth.

That should give you the framework for space travel in the Solar System. I wouldn't worry too much about the diagram being outdated too often. If it happens, it's because of some very significant event.

Anybody is welcome to check those figures, I might have messed them up a bit.

Judd:
Christoph,

That all isn't nitpicky, that is absolutely awesome.  Thank you.

3-4 months to Pluto is just about right, I think.

Thanks again, great stuff.

Judd

Joel P. Shempert:
One other thing, given that this is Sorcerer:

You can roll Cover or Lore (or Cover plus Lore, with appropriate narration?) for travel, and adjust travel time by the rollover bonuses.

Maybe that's obvious, I dunno., But it seems like it could become a big fucking deal when you're in the thick of the story to determine just how drastically you're going to be separated from your key relationships.

peace,
-Joel

Ron Edwards:
Not Cover + Lore, unless I'm mis-remembering something in the rules. It'd be one or the other rolled first against some handful of dice, then any victories would apply to the next, primary roll.

Best, Ron

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page