[IaWA] Challenger names Answerers, Answerers Call Back Later
Paul T:
Vincent,
That makes total sense. Thanks!
It doesn't seem all that complicated to me, either. I've seen that "moment" many times, and, indeed, the clarity of such a statement helps get everyone on the same page. It's a wonderful thing at work!
Part of the reason I'm guessing it's particularly valuable for IaWA is because you state *actions* rather than intents. Announcing who you think should answer reveals your intentions more clearly to the rest of the group. In the same way, the very definition of a Raise tells us what your intent is in Dogs. But that isn't present in the same way in IaWA, so the announcement helps it become visible for everyone.
Awesome, and clear, 100%. (Assuming I read you correctly, of course.)
Rafu:
Awesome! Thank you.
lumpley:
Cool and good! Glad to help. More questions always welcome.
-Vincent
Thomas Lawrence:
Just going to chime in to say that I love this, Vincent. I love it enough that it'd be worthy of being in a post on anyway for archival purposes.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page