The Later Blue Tome of Amaxathroth the Cursed
reason:
Why LS rather than Lulu? Primarily because one of the goals here is learning (certainly making money isn't high on the list...), and LS looks closer to the deep end in terms of forcing you to learn rather than holding your hand. Once I've figured out LS, I may go on and do Lulu as well.
James_Nostack:
Reason, is there any actual play on this? What's the source material? How does it differ from other Sword & Sorcery supplements like Charnel Gods and Dictionary of Mu?
Ron Edwards:
How about congratulations?
This is the first mini-supplement since the first wave of them over six years ago. I'm happy about that.
It is also the first to be put together without any editorial guidance from me, which I decided a while back was a bad idea. Sorcerer is now effectively an open license, asking only that original rules and text not be duplicated, and for complete referencing.
Best, Ron
greyorm:
Quote from: reason on July 28, 2009, 07:09:37 AM
Primarily because one of the goals here is learning (certainly making money isn't high on the list...), and LS looks closer to the deep end in terms of forcing you to learn rather than holding your hand.
Fair enough. Having read over the previews on the site, I'm really looking forward to getting a copy of this! (I tend not to buy PDF unless it comes down to that being the only option. So please let us know when the print version is available!)
Finarvyn:
I bought one.
I thought about waiting to see what others had to say, particularly since Ron didn't put in his two cents before it went public. Then I decided that I had made too many comments about the lack of support for Sorcerer and that I needed to back 'em up with my pocketbook.
I've only glanced through parts but it looks neat so far. And there are two versions -- regular and printer friendly. Nice!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page