How about some love for Sex?
Roger:
I might suggest that the people who most fully embrace Sex & Sorcery are also the least likely to publicly dissect their experiences with it. It's a personal thing by design, and the better it's working the more personal it is.
jburneko:
I wanted to acknowledge the call for my further thoughts. I've been really busy and my thoughts are lengthy so I haven't had the chance to do the full write up. When I do, I'll start another thread so as not to completely hijack this one.
Jesse
James_Nostack:
I actually re-read Sex & Sorcery as a result of this thread. I have a bit to say about it, but I've been ill and work-busy and haven't had time to write stuff up. It's probably my favorite of the supplements - certainly the richest in terms of ideas.
Ron Edwards:
Hello,
Roger, that's probably true. But it's all the more reason to engage in interesting dialogue in terms of actual play discussions, as I see it. If you get A from the text and I get B (or beta, or 7, or pi), then I think both of our experiences and reflections are enhanced if you and I happen to talk about our games together, later. My hope is that this thread might spur such discussions.
James and Jesse, I'll look forward to your posts when you get the time.
Best, Ron
Calithena:
Well, this is a more superficial response, but Azk'arn is totally metal and I love it. Also one of the great short-form fantasy world descriptions in all of RPGs. Something I'd like to see more people exposed to, actually.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page