Questions, concerns, befuddlements
Ron Edwards:
Whoops, thanks Dave - I did miss your post.
Here are some of my notions about your question. #2 is probably the most direct answer, but the points are all related.
1. The issue isn't originality vs. not, but rather good or not.
2. Any understandable interpretation of a given term is all right. The limit to "understandable" vs. "oh come on" is only found in my head, but I assure you it's very generous. As long as I can see how you got to that use of the term, it doesn't matter whether I would have gone that way myself.
3. Sometimes the most important thing isn't the specific term, but how the two terms relate (for you), and what other terms or game-ideas crop up according to that relationship.
I hope that helps. One of the most important parts of the Ronnies, to me, is seeing the incredible variety of term-interpretation and usage, so go where you will.
Best, Ron
Callan S.:
Oh, could anyone recommend a free PDF converter they use/trust. I honestly don't know of any and would prefer to use one someone else has (a free one :) )
Ron Edwards:
Damn good question. I found this one through sheer Google luck some years ago and it's always treated me well: PDF Converter. But my experience is an uninformed anecdote and anyone with a more knowledgeable perspective should weigh in.
Best, Ron
Ante:
OpenOffice can export to PDF and can read MS Word and a bunch of other formats, it might be a good alternative to start writing in as well. Quite decent price as well.
I have used the same converter as Ron once as well.
David Berg:
Thanks, Ron, that was quite helpful.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page