*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
October 21, 2014, 12:39:57 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
46709 Posts in 5588 Topics by 13297 Members Latest Member: - Shane786 Most online today: 25 - most online ever: 429 (November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: Writing a Mystery for an RPG  (Read 10111 times)
Quazar
Registree

Posts: 1


« on: March 11, 2011, 12:28:22 PM »

I really want to encourage deductive reasoning and an organic story, and I remember that Forge used to have a GREAT thread about this.  I can't seem to find it though.  Can anyone link it?  Or if the original genius participants are still around, can we go through the process again?  I think real mystery is a vital genre in RPGs, but one that requires a lot of Game Master preparation.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Logged
Erik Weissengruber
Member

Posts: 601

Designing "In this Sign, Conquer:


WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2011, 02:20:55 PM »

I remember it.

I think you mean
"Mysteries: Step by Step Instructions"
http://indie-rpgs.com/archive/index.php?topic=13089.15

Here are some related threads

* Mysteries can have a solid backstory even with heavy player input into the fiction
Quote
"However, play itself will be nothing like (say) Call of Cthulhu, i.e. following the trail of bread-crumbs scattered in order as the GM sees fit. It will be much more dynamic and capitalize on dice-outcomes as sort of an assistant-director that everyone is working with.

A lot of people seem to think that The Pool enforces highly, highly improvisational play in terms of the world and the back-story of the scenario. I don't think it necessarily does."
http://indie-rpgs.com/archive/index.php?topic=5591.0

* Players Creating & Solving Mysteries
Quote
"... can you make a mystery style game in which the players are going to create the clues and create the answer to which they point?"
http://indie-rpgs.com/archive/index.php?topic=8901.0
[It violates the lumpley principle but might still be workable]

* Is a GM-Less Mystery With a Stable Backstory Possible?
Quote
so long as anyone running a mystery is willing to swear up and down that he or she has kept the required elements to a bare minimum, you can shared-GM any mystery you like; in the end, the thing will be horrendously complicated, I guarantee, because people will start inventing crazy things that make up a wonderfully "thick" description of the situation.  Then they'll start running down the red herrings to see which ones matter.
http://indie-rpgs.com/archive/index.php?topic=9750.0

* A Scattering of Options
~ "One technique I've used in the past is to allow players to collect undetermined clues as well as predetermined one."
~ "Decide the answer. Tell the players the answer. Then make them generate the clues and the path of reasoning that gets their characters to that realization."
~ "there are three places that the challenge can arise: 1) Finding the clues that matter; 2) Recognizing that certain pieces of information are in fact important clues; 3) Solving the mystery based upon the clues. The question is, where do you want the mystery to fall?"
~ "I find the best way to push mysteries is to make every NPC very talkative"
http://www.indie-rpgs.com/archive/index.php?topic=13013
Logged
Ron Edwards
Global Moderator
Member
*
Posts: 17707


WWW
« Reply #2 on: March 13, 2011, 12:52:13 PM »

Links:
[Mage: The Awakening] Here goes nothing ... (split): mainly about about GM-prepped mysteries, but easily extended to systems with more piecemeal distribution of authority. This thread is also a launch platform for tons of threads.
frustration with "enigmas": the oldest thread about this stuff on the Forge, still worth considering.

Best, Ron
Logged
Erik Weissengruber
Member

Posts: 601

Designing "In this Sign, Conquer:


WWW
« Reply #3 on: March 13, 2011, 05:31:38 PM »

Clearly, I am no investigator.  Those were the ones I was looking for!
Logged
KevinH
Member

Posts: 19


« Reply #4 on: March 14, 2011, 07:35:41 AM »

Hi guys,

Googling around this subject, I found this article The Three Clue Rule. Personally, I think that it's a good rule to follow.

In a nutshell, even if you are doing a trail of breadcrumbs leave lots of crumbs, not just one.

It makes in-genre sense, as investigations don't usually hinge on one clue but a preponderance of evidence. In Mysteries. Step by step instructions. the argument is that getting a single clue is not important, fitting that one clue into a chain is not important but that developing a reasonable hypothesis based upon a preponderance of evidence is (and by important, I mean crucial to the investigation AND fun to play).

I'm currently developing an investigative plot and I've tried to include multiple paths to the solution. I don't know how well it will work, but it seems playable to me and I don't see any choke points.

Kevin

p.s. If you're interested, I can post a summary of the plot.
Logged
Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!