idea for a new Endeavor
Ron Edwards:
Quote
Personally, all of the CA-related insights I can call to mind right now are things that I expect we'll inevitably address in the course of striving to design for fun and functional play.
Collapses into easy chair, swears never again to engage in CA debate, intending always to point to this quote instead.
Best, Ron
Mael:
Thanks David, that’s much clearer now.
About the order of the steps, I can’t think of a better than the one you proposed.
A character creation step seems fine to me, probably near the reward step.
About the CA, well I have to agree with you (and Ron) on that one : this kind of discussion should not keep us away from what really matters, having fun designing a great system.
(I’m afraid I already put some CA stuff on my last post about SBP, but I promise you that I will not make it a priority)
Mael.
David Berg:
It probably doesn't need saying at this point, but this endeavor will not be happening on the Forge. I had a busy month, no one else jumped up to organize, and now we're out of time.
My intent now is to wrap up the SBP threads with useful summaries to make it as easy as possible to refer back to them from wherever else the project may land. I may set up a site, or just go to RPGnet or Praxis.
I am short on time to do the summaries justice, so if anyone else feels like it, please go ahead! I will read and comment with enthusiasm.
Ps,
-David
Dan Maruschak:
I didn't keep up with all of the threads (I find it difficult to maintain interest text-based AP reports) and I'm not sure I 100% understand the definition of SBP, but I tried to embed some of my ideas about GM prepped plot and keeping the resolution system orthogonal to plot in my Game Chef game Getting There in Time.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page