News:

Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.

Main Menu

Approaching the mundanity levels of TV drama

Started by pete_darby, July 10, 2003, 10:54:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

pete_darby

this is followoing on from the Laser Shark thread...

also references This RPG.net thread, which references a discussion on the Herow Wars mailing list, and a huge amount of fantastic stuff by Roderick Robertson, Bruce Ferrie and TIm Ellis, amongst others.

Okay, checked out the old thread on mundane gaming, and just trying to deal with the main issues raised there...

The games I'm thinking about would simulate the reality of a medical or legal or cop show as well as D&D simulates combat oriented fantasy.

Everyone who's played in a game with a martial artist or weapons expert will know that they either nitpick the combat system, pile on the house rules, bite their tongues for the enjoyment of the group, or otherwise turn off their expertise for the duration of the game.

The game I'm thinking of would do the same for the medical, legal or procedural process. Accurate modelling of correct procedure isn't necessary, but verisimilitude is, to enhance the drama of the situation.

For example, I have some medical training (2 years radiography). My partner is a trained nurse with five years experience. we both watch British and American Medical dramas (though please god, not any heartwarming ones set in the dales, the sixties, or the dales in the sixties). Both of us have an unwritten rule that we kibbitz on medical matters only in bad episodes.

(We also play the "guess the victim and tragedy" game beloved of all regular Casualty viewers, but I digress)

That's the kind of attitude I want to see supported in the game: when watching ER, most viewers know enough that a sucking chest wound is bad news. They don't know why or how, but it sounds bad, and everyone's panicking. That's the level of information you need... if a player has more expertise, that's great, but in an emeregncy room you only need to have a couple of bits of information about a condition, and you can pretty much wing it.

And those couple of bits of information are, essentially, contained in the monster manual for the game, each "monster" being a medical condition, with presenting symptoms, likely treatments with their chances of succes, probable complications, etc.

Plus additional complications familiar to any viewer of medical drama "You used to be the best damn neurosurgeon in Topeka!" "Till you served your decree nisi, Margaret, I was! Now lok at me!"

We still have a conflict, not procedural, system, but the conflict is between the PC and the condition.

The important thing isn't getting the medical knowledge right, but drama, verisimilitude and conviction.

If the players get too worried about doing it right... well, they don't tend to worry about doing combat "right", just right enough. Most times, cool is better than right in dramtic combat games. Why not in dramatic medical games?
Pete Darby

Bruce Baugh

Quote from: pete_darbyThe important thing isn't getting the medical knowledge right, but drama, verisimilitude and conviction.

Yes, precisely. The players should get the opportunity to feel that they're having their characters do cool and suitable things.
Writer of Fortune
Gamma World Developer, Feyerabend in Residence
http://bruceb.livejournal.com/

Ron Edwards

Agreed!

In law, cop, and medical shows, it's not really the actual skills that are being showcased, so much as various characters' personal qualities, while exercising those skills. Integrity, courage, pettiness, cunning, whatever ... all the technical expertise is Color.

And then of course, you have all the secondary distractions like romance, family hassles, or what-have-you, for which the question is, "Will this help or hinder the real tasks at hand?" So you have one relationship which provides strength and grounding for protagonist A to deal bravely with a difficult operation, whereas there's this other relationship which makes the protagonist nervous and jumpy, so he over-estimates his ability to handle a professional crisis ... and so on.

Best,
Ron

John Kim

Quote from: pete_darbyThat's the kind of attitude I want to see supported in the game: when watching ER, most viewers know enough that a sucking chest wound is bad news. They don't know why or how, but it sounds bad, and everyone's panicking. That's the level of information you need... if a player has more expertise, that's great, but in an emeregncy room you only need to have a couple of bits of information about a condition, and you can pretty much wing it.

And those couple of bits of information are, essentially, contained in the monster manual for the game, each "monster" being a medical condition, with presenting symptoms, likely treatments with their chances of succes, probable complications, etc.  
OK, this sounds pretty cool.  I think we should focus on a particular genre -- you've specified medical dramas.  The only TV medical drama I am familiar with, though, is M*A*S*H.  It is a bit different because it is in a warzone.  The vast majority of treatment is bullets and shrapnel to the torso.  Still, there is a fair bit of treatment.  

If you are going to give more system detail to these, then you have to decide what the sort of choices the player is making.  For example, in combat you often have choices between defense, hit chance, and damage.  In tackling a medical problem, the choices are different.  For example, the player choices might be things like:
1) More invasive procedure, which may completely solve the problem but is risky
2) Less invasive, which may let a condition go on too long, but lessens chance of harm.

or
1) Wait to diagnose further, vs
2) Take action immediately

or
1) try to cure completely, at the risk of catastrophe/death, vs
2) save the patient's life but leave her crippled

also
1) Experiment with a newer procedure which may be better, but may not.
- John

Daniel Solis

This is a very intiguing premise. I'd be intrigued with the peripheral concerns of the Dramatic Doctor besides the actual medical task at hand. Frequently the drama on ER (last time I watched) were unusual non-medical circumstances with which the Staff (PC group?) had to deal.

- Irrational family members barging in the emergency room
- Malpractice lawsuits
- Breaking the news of a failed medical task to loved ones
- Losing or trying to gain residency at a hospital
- Having to be the one that demotes or promotes other staff members
- Stress-related psychological problems
- And always, always frenetic flashing of lights and beeping of medical equipment.

A friend of mine just suggested irregularly scheduled players be re-occuring patients at the hospital who come in for the same problems over and over but who are tolerated because of their entertainment value... and that Hippocratic thingy.
¡El Luchacabra Vive!
-----------------------
Meatbot Massacre
Giant robot combat. No carbs.

Comte

I think...that an interesting way to do that would be to build off of this idea:

Quote
Suppose the GM of a detail-heavy martial arts game told the players up front: "I have 4 carefully mapped out locations for fights: an abandoned mine shaft, a foundry full of molten metal, a gangster's mansion, and the wing of a biplane used by a stunt pilot. Also, someone will have to seduce a femme fatale. I'm gonna start you at the Dragon Boat races in Hong Kong harbour, where you are trying to prevent the assasination of a politician friend of yours. The challenge is this: I want you guys to incorporate all of these locales, and the seduction scene, into a convincing sequence. If you stick to your characters, and you maintian at least a John Woo level of plausibility, I will give you 1 [insert combat-assisting token] for every scene you incorporate.

This idea was originaly put forth by epweissengruber in this thread:
http://www.indie-rpgs.com/viewtopic.php?t=7097&start=30


So I think we can take this idea, disasemble it, and reasemble in into such a way so that the players can have the illusion of doing cool and sucessful things.  Instead of having mapped out combat locations you could have events like:
QuoteIrrational family members barging in the emergency room
- Malpractice lawsuits
- Breaking the news of a failed medical task to loved ones
- Losing or trying to gain residency at a hospital
- Having to be the one that demotes or promotes other staff members
- Stress-related psychological problems


One the players sucessfuly navigate these stressful social situations in a satifying way they get skill points in which they can preform sucessful operations and other job defining things that require talent.  I think with a little monkeying this could work out wonderfuly well.  I'm not sure how.  Midterms brain is fried.  I just noticed that this might be the round peg we are looking for.
"I think where I am not, therefore I am where I do not think.
What one ought to say is: I am not whereever I am the plaything of my thought; I think of what I am where I do not think to think."
-Lacan
http://pub10.ezboard.com/bindierpgworkbentch

M. J. Young

My computer just froze, so I lost an almost complete post.

I like John's ideas for the drama. I'll add triage to the list: does this patient need to be seen now, or can he wait while we deal with that patient? If you fail in triage, patients in your waiting room are getting worse.

Recurring patients for sporadic players is a good idea. They call these frequent flyers in most hospitals I've seen. There are a lot of good reasons they're there, and a few bad ones. Nursing home residents and severely ill people on home care often are brought in when they have severe problems and returned when they are stabilized. Indigent people sometimes lack the ability to provide adequate medical care for themselves and so are brought in when they are serious. People in hazardous occupations (that includes, for example, professional athletes) come in for job-related injuries. There are, of course, those who use the ER as a clinic, coming in for ordinary medical care in the off hours.

There are a lot of other ways to handle such players, though. Specialists are called in when needed. I know the best osteopath in the county is in the operating room doing open reductions six to ten hours a day two or three days a week, and still goes in for emergencies at other times. Cardiologists and surgeons are also frequently consulted from the ER.

It also occurs to me that my hospital ER is staffed around the clock all week, and I probably have met most of the doctors and nurses who work there at one time or another, but they aren't all there at once. There's no reason why in this kind of game player characters whose players are at the table can't be the ones on duty, and other player characters can't be off today, or on vacation this week. Even, if it's a very rural area, it might be that the doctors are not emergency medicine specialists but doctors pulling time in the ER for extra money. A lot of young doctors used to do that in the county only a couple decades ago, before they brought in an emergency practice to take it over. Thus you could have family physicians and osteopaths and radiologists who also work in the ER. Their absence on any particular day or stretch is because they're pursuing their regular practice at that time. That's less common now, but I'd bet it's still found in rural locations.

Also, generally interns and residents are only found in teaching hospitals; that means they're students, and have school requirements in addition to hospital shifts. They have grueling schedules, and a lot of them burn out.

--M. J. Young

Daniel Solis

Quote from: M. J. YoungThey have grueling schedules, and a lot of them burn out.

Perhaps I'm thinking too mechanically, but it'd be interesting if these little incidents would have stress ratings similar to the hazard ratings in octaNe. More people assisting in an incident could reduce the stress on an individual participant. Frequent and prolonged exposure to stress would have cumulative effects like irritability and whatnot. Could be fun to role-play.
¡El Luchacabra Vive!
-----------------------
Meatbot Massacre
Giant robot combat. No carbs.

pete_darby

Quote from: gobi
Quote from: M. J. YoungThey have grueling schedules, and a lot of them burn out.

Perhaps I'm thinking too mechanically, but it'd be interesting if these little incidents would have stress ratings similar to the hazard ratings in octaNe. More people assisting in an incident could reduce the stress on an individual participant. Frequent and prolonged exposure to stress would have cumulative effects like irritability and whatnot. Could be fun to role-play.

Going back to my favourite mechanic, the extended contest from Hero Wars, you can apply this quite easily, if it's the main theme of the evening. In TV hospital dramas, this theme of overtiredness, while a background thing much of the time, only comes into it's own when the whole episode is focussed on the Shift from Hell, as opposed to the usual function of work as either a counterpoint to the soap elements that week, or a sad attempt to inject some action into a dull episode

Set the whole set up as an extended contest of the players versus The Shift From Hell... SFH gets attributes like "Gang War: 17m1" or "Flu epidemic: 18m2" or, "Plane Crash Downtown: 10m4". The dramatic intention of the SFH is to force the pc's to drop through exhaustion. The PC's intended outcome can be Just get through this, or save everyone, or whatever, tied to their personal traits.

High risk bids can involve the PC's falling back on bad coping mechanisms such as drugs or drink, calling in political favours to get more staff assigned, closing the ER to new cases...

Low bids by the SFH can be standard cases, rumours of other hospitals closing their doors... higher bids are the old standbys of three gunshot patients and only two beds, infected patient coughs blood at you (okay, I saw 28 days later last night...).

Associated and unrelated actions are the usual business of the hospital; test being sent for, it's your sick mother on line 4....

It's very much like the way HW suggests to run large battles, or epic plotlines.

The big judgment call to make, like with most HW games, is deciding at the start of the session what the main conflict is going to be. It's, I suppose, a social contract thing.
Pete Darby

contracycle

M.J. wrote
QuoteThere's no reason why in this kind of game player characters whose players are at the table can't be the ones on duty, and other player characters can't be off today, or on vacation this week.

Yes yes.  This could be exploited such that each session is a shift, and it runs more or less in real time as the game does.  So that way each time you show to play, it hopefully has ther sensation of having its own momentum.  Theres no going back and no stalling things waiting for other players.  Conversely, not showing means missing out in a real sense but is easily incorporated through MJ's concept, so that it integrates easily and permits a potentially more widely accessible game.

This implies that either each session is a distinct game, or that the hospital as context has an identity external to the characters, ands exists to be modified in some way.  Beyond layout and so forth, the situation and setting could be contrived to contain certain local features in the form of approaching crises or perenial dilemmas, something like gobi's idea.

I also like the stress idea as a long term metric.  Things like career progression and actual expertise might also work on that long a time frame, developed over sessions and affected by action.
Impeach the bomber boys:
www.impeachblair.org
www.impeachbush.org

"He who loves practice without theory is like the sailor who boards ship without a rudder and compass and never knows where he may cast."
- Leonardo da Vinci

Daniel Solis

Quote from: contracycleThings like career progression and actual expertise might also work on that long a time frame, developed over sessions and affected by action.

I'm imagining something like Madness Meters in Unknown Armies. Stress checks of lower rank than traits like Career Progression or Expertise will incur no penalties to maintaining composure during the procedure. Taking relaxants or other types of drugs can give temporary resilience to the stresses that you'd normally be unable to handle calmly on your own.
¡El Luchacabra Vive!
-----------------------
Meatbot Massacre
Giant robot combat. No carbs.

James Holloway

Stress and burnout ratings are a very good idea indeed. Ideally, "doing your job well" should increase the burnout rating, putting in an incentive for PC staff to be slack. However, the idealistic rookie who works like mad will eventually wind up taking those burnout penalties to his skills, which means one day he'll walk out of the ER and someone'll say "where's the scalpel?" and he'll say "shit! still in the patient!" and be disgraced. Meanwhile, old Doctor Bumfuzzle who takes it easy is just plugging along, loathed by the rookie who just doesn't understand him.

I really like the "shift" idea, too. It makes a lot of sense.

You could get away with a fairly low level of medical knowledge as long as you were willing to sound like you knew what you were talking about. What's the cliche? "I need 20 ccs of medicine, STAT!"

Daniel Solis

Quote from: James HollowayYou could get away with a fairly low level of medical knowledge as long as you were willing to sound like you knew what you were talking about. What's the cliche? "I need 20 ccs of medicine, STAT!"

A chapter devoted to a rundown of "Dramatic Medical Lingo" would be cool. I think the Buffy RPG did a similar treatment with Buffyspeak.

Part of the fun of the game would be doing a "character creation" for the hospital itself. What kind of funding does it get? Average staff burnout rate? Most common medical cases? Is the hospital respected? If so, among whom? Is there rivalry between departments?

EDIT:

I just thought of a name for this game, slap me if it's too cheesy:

STAT!
The Game of Medical Drama



EDIT2:

And a name for its sister rpg:

Objection!
The Game of Legal Drama
¡El Luchacabra Vive!
-----------------------
Meatbot Massacre
Giant robot combat. No carbs.

pete_darby

Quote from: gobi
Quote from: contracycleThings like career progression and actual expertise might also work on that long a time frame, developed over sessions and affected by action.

I'm imagining something like Madness Meters in Unknown Armies. Stress checks of lower rank than traits like Career Progression or Expertise will incur no penalties to maintaining composure during the procedure. Taking relaxants or other types of drugs can give temporary resilience to the stresses that you'd normally be unable to handle calmly on your own.

I'd model them as giving bonuses for a scene, but forcing checks against increasing a dependency trait, which leads to all sorts of descent into hell fun stuff....
Pete Darby

contracycle

Somne thoughts on the shift structure.  This could be used as very overt staging and scene framing.  Now its a long time since I watched ER or any opf the procedurals, but we could set up a "locker room" scene at the bginning, cut to the on-shift action onece that scene is done, do Lunch as a scene if available, a second on shift, then packing up and getting out.

The point is that this frames some of the action such that the characters go back to their private lives and interact personally, rather than in a goal-oriented manner during the on shift stretches.  Secondly, the start phase would hopefully serve as a "getting into the groove" moment and the packing up as a "debriefing" stage, sort of, or a "winding down" opportunity.

There should be mechanical actions specific to each phase.  So maybe, at lunch, you can do a save vs. stress or something similar to shrug off the mornings nastiness - IF you get lunch.  Maybe theres a similar save during packing up, and they accumulate if you didn't or couldn't save at lunch break.  This could be used to provoke directly inter-active behaviour amongst characters - Sharing A Joke at lunch gives bonuses to a stress save, having a squash partner with whom you depart at Packing Up gives bonuses there.  

An office romance gives both bonuses and penalties, I reckon.  Maybe external romances and family relationships can be used as devices manipulating stress levels, allowing possibly individual "outside cameos", sorta thing.

It's interesting to wonder whether or not this all drives directly at both the party approach and overt cooperation.  Sure, they're all working toward the same goal but they, the characters, need not necessarily be cooperative all the time.  Maybe stabbing a fellow player in the back gives you better opportunities for a promotion (which I would think at least temporarily off-sets stress) but gives the character you stabbed stress. Maybe sharing a whinge about a colleague offloads stress, as does dumping your work on others.  

Alternatively, there might be room for a sort of gambling system, in which the players select which topics or problems in which to commit their characters sense of satisfaction and wellbeing.  If there is a good (mostly medical) outcome, you get paid bennies, but if it all goes horribly wrong the character is devestated and acquires further problems/guilt/stress.
Impeach the bomber boys:
www.impeachblair.org
www.impeachbush.org

"He who loves practice without theory is like the sailor who boards ship without a rudder and compass and never knows where he may cast."
- Leonardo da Vinci